Originally Posted by
redraven
I don't really condone any 'beating' or 'violence' in any relationship with adults or children. It solves nothing at all, the only time I have smacked my son on the bum (through clothes) is when he has done something seriously dangerous which is very rare and tbh even then I wished I hadn't smacked him because it solved nothing. I think it was done more to create a shock value and to make a point that could have been made verbally and with the retraction of toys/treats as he was only young.
This may cause controversy but I think those that 'beat' their children are too lazy to think of alternatives or don't have confidence in their own abilities to know that their non violent punishment will work. I was never beaten as a child, I have masses of respect for my parents, I never went off the rails, never got into drink or drugs, did well at school etc, my parents had far better coping strategies than to resort to violence.
I'd be mortified if I beat my child only for him to beat me back when older if I ever wronged him (which I aim never to do of course), how could I argue against it? And then what if his friends/siblings did something wrong? Would it be ok for him to beat them too? Violence solves nothing.
Btw my description of 'beating' a child is to strike them hard or use an object to hit them with, I do not include a short smack to the bum/legs to very young children as opposed to beating up a 13year old with a belt or stick.